Safety & compliance pressure
Situation
“An audit is eight weeks out — and we're not sure our evidence will hold up.”
Findings or non-conformities from audits and assessments are on the table — a clear action plan is missing. An external audit or assessment is imminent, preparation is incomplete. Responsibilities for functional safety in the project are not clearly assigned. There is uncertainty about whether the safety concepts and analyses are really audit-proof and at the same time lean. The question: could you face an external audit today with confidence?
These two offerings address the situation most directly. We recommend requesting both — together they form the most robust picture.
High-level assessment of safety concepts and compliance risks.
A compact view of HARA and safety concepts, FMEA/FTA approaches and compliance risks against the standards relevant to your product — including an assessment of gaps, risks and priorities. Useful as a basis for management decisions, audit preparation or scope alignment.
A condensed view of your safety concept, safety artefacts and targeted next steps.
Ahead of reviews, audits or concept decisions we create a reliable inside view: we check whether the defined measures are effective, lean and efficient, whether the supporting analyses are sufficient, and whether traceability holds — and identify the steps with the greatest effect.
Useful to add depending on the project situation. Drop into the cart if needed.
Clarity on viability, interfaces and critical architectural decisions.
Transparency on structure, consistency and continuity of requirements.
Focus on fault sources, risks and robustness gaps during integration.
